| Notes |
Skidmore, Randel VA BOTETOURT CO. 654 1810 10021-4111000
654 7 Skidmore Randel
4m 0-10
1m 1 1 0
1 0 0 2 1 0 0
Skidmore, Randolph VA BOTETOURT CO. 073 1820
Skidmore, Eleanor VA BOTETOURT CO. 317 1830 (Widow of Randolph)
Skidmore, Archibald VA BOTETOURT CO. 317 1830
1850 Botetourt Co. VA
1029/1029 Eleanor Skidmore 70 F 1875...........PA!
Peyton R. 39 M Farmer VA
Allen T.? 37 M ditto VA
Catharine Thomas 37 F VA
1023/1023 David Skidmore 40 M Farmer 500 VA
June 37 F VA
Sarah A. 8 F VA
John J. 7 M VA
Charles H. 3 M VA
Mary F. 7/12 F VA
from Angela Ruely:
Dorthie & Edwin Kirkpatrick. Rockbridge County Marriages, 1778-1850. Iberian, Athens, GA: 1985.
p. 193.
Skidmore, Randolph & Polly Sloan 26 Mar 1797; d/o Archibald bond or license only.
p. 402
Sloan, Elenor & Randolph Skidmore 26 Mar 1797; d/o Archibald Bond or license date only
Virginia Marriages, Early to 1800:
Skidmore, Randolph to Elenor Sloan, 26 Mar 1797, Rockbridge VA
Rockbridge county website
Know all men by these presents that we Randolph Skidmore & Archibald Sloan -----
are are held & firmly bound to James Wood Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia or his successor in the sum of one hundred and fifty dollars to which payment well and truly to be made we bind ourselves our heirs & executors and jointly and severally by these presents—
Witness our hands and seals this 26th day of March 1799
The condition of the above obligation is such that whereas there is a marriage shortly intended to be solemnized between the above bound Randolph Skidmore & Elenor Sloan daughter of said Arch.d Sloan of said Rockbridge county—
If therefore there shall be no lawful course to obstruct the same then this obligation to be void or else to remain in full force.
Randolph Skidmore (seal)
Archibald Sloan (seal)
Teste - A. Raid Cl
From Richard: a Court document showing division of property:
We, Robert Irvine , John McKnight & William H Douthat, three of the commissioners appointed at the August Court of Botetourt County to make partition of the lands of Randolph Skidmore ded'd, amongst his heirs and to make report to Court, met on Tuesday the 21st September on the aforesaid lands, and after making a careful examination and survey of the same proceeded to lay of as the dower of Elenor Skidmore, widow of Randolph Skidmore dec'd, (altho not required by the order of the court to do so) that part of the farm on which the dwelling house stands represented on the annexed plat as ABCDA. Beginning at a Gum at A corner to the land lately purchased by ____ from Matthew Courton and with a line of the same S47 E 148 poles to a dead W Oak, thence a new line N34 E 50 poles to a White Oak corner to ____ Hill, thence with Hills line N31 W 128 to a White Oak, Hills corner on the River, thence up on the River 90 poles to the Beginning containing 60 acres. We also give to the dower the Ferry, which we consider of but little value.
The remainder of the old land ABEFGHIR 114 acres and IHGFLKI 50 acres, a part of the 100 acres ________ we divided into 9 parts as represented on the plat, as near of the same value as we could. They were then drawn for by the parties, seven of them being present and Nathan Packey un foresen partive of Mrs Ruth Skidmore and WH Douthats Leonard Ballew. No 1 was drawn by Archibald Skidmore, No. 2 Allen Skidmore, No. 3 Peyton Skidmore, No. 4 Andrew Skidmore, No. 5 Leonard Ballew, No. 6 David Skidmore, No 7 Anthony Ogden, No. 8 Ruth Skidmore, widow of James. No. 9 John Skidmore.
The remainder of the 100 acre tract LMNOPFL about 60 acres, being so situated that it could not be attached to anyof the lots we proposed to _____________________- who own the land adjoining purchased of MW Houston, that they should take it at our valuation being of but little value to any one but themselves and the consented to take it and the value thereof divided between lots Nos 5, 6, 7, & 8. Robert Irvine & John McKnight who were well acquainted with the land determined its value at $20 (Twenty dollars) and that amount is to be paid to the owners of lots 6, 7, 8, &5, that is $5 each.
The above named John McKnight who acted with the undersighned in making the partition & so forth in the foregoing report having departed this life without signing the report, they as the survivors are under the necesity of signing and returning it without being sarisfied with the partition ____?___ assured the posesion and ownership of hte ?????? allotted to them as set forth above, and the ??????? and recording of the report and paltt are now only necessary as a means of indicating the different shaves and the metes and bounds thereof.
WH Douthat
Robert Irvine
At Botetourt January Court 1831 - this plat and report of the division of the lands of Randolph Skidmore dec'd among his heirs entitled thereto was this day returned to Court and rdered to be recorded.
A Copy Teste
F Woltz, clerk
On the page with the plat:
AEFGHIRCDA represents (?) the lands of the widow and heirs of Randolph Skidmore,
dec'd. Wm Anderson Surveyor, Feby 27th, 1823 by order of court this survey was
made to divide the lands between MW Houston and R Skidmore dec'd representative.
IKLLMNOPFGHI is a tract of land ???? patented to R Skidmore March 1st 1803
Archibald Skidmore
Allen Skidmore
Peyton Skidmore
Andrew Skidmore
Leonard Ballew
David Skidmore
Anthony Ogden
Ruth, widow of James Skidmore
John Skidmore
|
West Virginia Pioneers
